🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.